Symposium on "Preventing and Coping with HlV/AlDS in Post-Conflict Societies: Gender Based Lessons from Sub-Saharan Africa"
Prepared by
Nsama Chikwanke
SOCIETY FOR WOMEN AND AIDS IN ZAMBIA (SWAAZ)
A NARRATIVE ON "COMMUNITY RESPONSES TO REFUGEE CRISIS; A BETTER WAY TO COPE"
BACKGROUND
The Society for women and AIDS in Zambia (SWAAZ) has, for the past 10 years, been reaching out to grassroots communities to sensitize, educate and conscietize them on HlV/AlDS and other related issues. Central to its programs are the women (including the girl‑child) and Youth, perceived to be vulnerable, who have been empowered with knowledge on their rights, sexual and reproductive health, and encouraging income generating activities as well as training in various skills including psycho‑social and counseling to enable them be very responsive and be able to sustain themselves. With community ownership of its programs and therefore volunteer driven, the organization has a strong presence in eight of the nine regions and is actively spread out in North Western, Western Luapula and Northern regions where communities are directly grappling with the refugee crisis.
'The arrival of asylum seekers on these hosting communities inadvertently leads to the disruption of social systems as they brace themselves to make necessary adjustments to accommodate these refugees. In an effort to adapt, these communities undergo, in varying, degrees a loosening of the moral fabric, reduced economic opportunities, and a reduction in the availability of resources and other opportunities. This situation is potentially explosive in that the costs may perceive refugees as 'competitor.‑;' and may adopt an aggressive attitude displayed in unfriendly gestures and behaviors. This would consequently, make the refugees even more terrified and insecure as their perceived and hoped for peace in a land of refuge becomes far‑fetched, It is with this background that SWAAZ decided to put in place some interventions by initiating a project loosely named "Community Responses to Refugee crisis; a better way to cope".
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES
The purpose of this project was to raise community awareness on the influx of refugees and their plight. It was hoped it would stimulate positive responses and strengthen the capacity of women and youths in these communities to take a more pro‑active role in advocating for and adopting community building, and peace‑enhancing behaviours. Through skills training, the communities were to be empowered to effectively participate in the development, implementation and evaluation of programmes.
Objectives
| Help communities understand the nature, causes and effects of natural calamities including war | |
| Help them develop decision making and communication skills | |
| Enhance peer-to-peer education on matters of health | |
| Increase HlV/AlDS awareness in refugee crowded communities and hence empower rural communities with skills to stimulate their responsiveness to the pandemic |
PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION
The Project comprised a team of three field staff and driver all reporting to the Project Coordinator at the National Secretariat, Except for on the spot administrative matters, administrative and other logistical support were done at the Secretariat. Tremendous field support was received from our branches in the respective communities. The project was implemented in two phases.
Phase I
This included a needs assessment followed by a questionnaire. The aim was to establish die knowledge, attitude and practices of hosting communities towards the refugee crisis in Zambia. Targeted regions included, but not restricted to, those receiving and/or hosting these displaced people particularly Northwestern, Western, Luapula and Northern regions. The identified entry points were mainly the traditional rulers education authorities Political leaders as well as religious structures. The implementing agencies were the local SWAAZ branches while the Secretariat helped in monitoring and evaluation. This phase was expected to last three to six months.
Data analysis from the questionnaires revealed the following Key points:
These responses strengthened our resolve even further as we felt the urgent need to move in and clear some misconceptions. It was believed that anything done beyond this point would greatly help change the attitudes and behaviours of our respondents.
Phase II
In executing this stage guidance was drawn from the responses from the questionnaire, which also helped us develop our message. This message was to be transmitted through drama (public performances) and workshops/seminars as well as through poems, songs etc. The use (if the local language was encouraged, The aim was to sensitize and raise community awareness on the usefulness of refugees as my organization believes in the resourcefulness of every human individual, whether displaced or in their optimum social set ups. The above activities were to address the following concerns, among others,
‑ Who is my neighbour;
‑ Refugee crisis: causes and content;
‑ Social responsibility and community living;
‑ HlV/AlDS in refugee communities; how can we cope
Unfortunately before moving into workshops in the pilot region (North-western), the project was stalled as the resources allocated for this segment got swallowed up and was only to resume after resources were sourced. In other areas, even the sensitization would not lake off.
The resources so far ploughed into the project were drawn from some of our fundraising activities such as sell of second hand clothes donated by JICA (some were distributed to out orphans project and others were contributed to refugees at Makeni, Lusaka) and also from sell of the remainders of mealie meal distributed to our women and micro credit project and donated by HELP Zambia. In short, the project was kicked off without specific external funding such as that when our limited resources were sucked up, this particular project had reached a 'natural' dead end. The expansiveness of the project (which increased running costs) and the poor performance of local economy greatly contributed to the short-circuiting of the project.
Despite the project being short‑lived before it could be adapted to other vulnerable regions, the project staff and team were encouraged that it took off and particularly that communities overwhelmingly responded to most of the public performances, attributable to the active involvement of the local leaders and synergism of all local efforts.
Among the unexpected outcomes was the shortfall in resources, it also became difficult to access certain areas while at some public performances (about two), the audience comprised mostly young ones as their elders were reportedly out in the field collecting food and or preparing the land for the farming season. At the stage the project stalled, it was very difficult to conclusively assess the impact though indicators suggested it would be one great project if only it was given the opportunity to reach maturity.
INDICATORS OF SUCCESS
From the outset, the following were expected to point to the success of this project.
| A more responsive community ready to take tip its role in enhancing community and social responsibility | |
| Successful implementation of such joint activities as charitable work in the neigbbourbood | |
| Joint and inclusive development of regional and branch work plans and strategies tailored towards nipping in the bud recipes for conflict. |
In the short time that the project existed major obstacles were mainly operational constraints in the form of such equipment as computers and communication facilities to link the field office with the main office. This often led to a delayed response to certain urgent calls. Though the district Agricultural authorities came to our aid from time to time, there was a need for heavy‑duty vehicles, the type that would work in sandy as well as hill), areas. Communities often times associate NGOs with monetary handouts and this had to be clarified which expectedly caused a slight drop in active participants including the frequency of attendance by some.
LESSONS LEARNED
RECOMMENDATIONS TO AFRICAN GOVERNMENTS AND POLICY MAKERS
RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY