|
HIV/AIDS
IN POST-CONFLICT SOCIETY Durban
– 26-28 March, 2001 MARY
BALIKUNGERI INTRODUCTION:
Stories recorded from the center:Clementine: a 24 year old at the time she died out of Aids. She lived and grew up in Gikongoro. Taken out of her hide out in a church to a nearby swamp and was gang raped for five days with nothing to drink or eat. After raping her, acid was poured in her private parts and they left her to die. Clementine was later discovered by the International Red Cross, taken to Central Hospital in Kigali in a critical situation. As the war was nearing to an end, Clementine was flown to Belgium by Medicins du Mode for a major operation where she remained for about eight months. Clementine returned to Rwanda in 1995 and was recommended to visit the center. She continued visiting the center and became an active member. Through the HIV awareness programme, she accepted to be diagonised HIV only to discover that she was HIV positive. Clementine was a regular and active member of the centre until August 2000 when she died’. These
stories could go on and on. The
1994 war and Genocide in Rwanda combined
all the worst crimes against humanity.
The women and girl child were the outstanding victims of war and other
acts of violence, the majority being permanently ill, with impaired health
status due to barbaric acts of rape. The
effects of this are, most women are HIV positive, have been widowed and orphan
fostering yet without the means to confront the daily life challenges.
Most of these families, lost their dear ones as well as property.
A big number of these, still occupy other people’s houses or inhabit
structures which were destroyed during the war thus the question of shelter.
Rape and sexual harassment was a “reliable weapon” during the 1994
Rwandan Genocide, thus the only single explanation to the birth of big numbers
of unwanted babies, HIV/AIDS infection and other related consequences . One
of the many challenges is finding remedies to the myriad problems facing the
Rwandan women from the aftermath of the genocide. There are needs in basic and strategic human needs.
Quotable degree of progress can be recorded in restoring key issues such
as security of persons, shelter, health care, economic and political
stabilization. However, some areas
such as social,psychological emotional counseling and HIV for trauma generated
out of the genocide are lagging behind by not receiving due attention in terms
of both skills and resource allocations. One
reason trauma counseling and HIV lag behind is because of its nature.
It is practically difficult because it deals directly with human
emotions. For
the “traumatized” to be emotionally rehabilitated, the trauma counseling
process begins by putting them in a position of having to recall and relive
experiences they would rather not remember.
Secondly, given the depth of trauma from the genocide, many “victims”
require intense individual psychological counseling.
This requires a lot of time, patience, skills and
committmemt towards social change. It
is against this background that the Rwandan Women’s Network, put in place a
center for women victims of violence known as “Polyclinic of Hope”. The
center was established in 1995 with a mission to cater for medical,
Psychological, and economic needs of the women victims of rape and other related
crimes. This process is one that is
viewed as the only process to
achieve Peace and Reconciliation. Currently
the center is handling five hundred and four women victims with members of their
families totaling to about 3,024 people. The
major interventions of the center for the welfare of the women and members of
their families include :
Although
on a very small scale and with very little support, Rwanda Women’s Network has
created and availed a secure space – not just in physical terms but in
emotional terms. That space is what
the victims of genocide and HIV sought. In
that space many things have evolved. One
of those things has been the solidarity the women have provided each other and
the sense of belonging and security which they lost in the Genocide encounter.
This is measured thru the support they give to each other when one of
them dies as a result of HIV/AIDS. Women
take turns to care for the sick and even when no funds are available, the
Merry-go-round introduced to women has been of great encouragement to the work
of the center. The
initial support of the clinic has come from Church World Service (USA), the
parent organization of Rwanda Women’s Network, others like USA Embassy,
Canadian Cooperation, Norwegian Church Aid, USA State Department , GTZ have all
supported RWN in carrying out different activities at the center.
RWN is currently lobbying for longer-term sustainable support.
The programme is focused on a construction of a women’s integrated
center to enable Rwanda Women’s Network promote its activities in one place. This long-term project is focusing on a bigger center to
carter for more women victims because the experience shows that there is a high
demand . A resource center for women for research purposes is in high demand
based on a number of people visiting our offices everyday. Special attention
is focusing on economic support to
the victims of HIV .At the clinic this programme has received very little
attention and yet this is a major development challenge.
The HIV/Care support programme has proved to be one of the mobilizing tool for HIV testing. The
programme has opened the way for members of the clinic to talk freely about HIV,
the Solidarity campaign in support of the victims of HIV has enabled many more
members to accepting testing. In my
opinion, this is one of the best methods towards prevention and coping up with
HIV. Prevention beyond awareness,
should be care of the HIV victims. For
this reason, donors and govts should pay more attention in the area of care
systems for the victims. It is only then, the stigma will begin to disappear and
people will begin to take the issues of AIDS more seriously. DEVELOPING
A COLLECTIVE CONSCIOUSNESS AND ACTION AGAINST GENDER BASED VIOLENCE:
Would
the world today have a serious AIDS epidemic if gender inequalities were less
pronounced? If more women were involved in the decision making of their national
developments? If more women were allowed the right to be angry and express it?
If more women had a greater control of matters related to their reproductive and
sexual health? If they enjoyed
greater access to economic opportunities and resources so that they would not
need to resort to exploitative occupations? If more men were willing to assume responsibility for
preventing HIV transmission and for caring
for family members who are HIV-positive?
It is against these questions that the Polyclinic of Hope beneficiaries
intend to stage a campain of Clinic replication in the Health Centres
of Rwanda to enable them share their experiences with others who have not
had the opportunity to do so. The
women at the center have had to learn to unmask their pains, anguish, shame,
guilt and their silence if they have to live again. The women are beginning to
learn to appreciate and value their many individual and collective rights :
the right to be; the right to feel pain and say it publicly; the right to
be angry and express it; the right to say no and enough is enough to war and
brutality in society; the right to condemn all forms of violence, discrimination
in society; the right to build solidarity of women for women as women and above
the right to political freedom and participation. The
women at the clinic for the last 5 years have been on a journey of
self-emptying. They have reached a point where they can now talk about their
experiences without that physical and mental pain.
They appear to be at a “safe place”now and are willing to come out
and pick up the many pieces. WAY
FORWARD:
Conclusion:
The
only response to the HIV epidemic in post-conflict societies, should be
addressed haulistically due to social realities and its interconnectedness if we
are to achieve a lasting peace. The
challenge therefore is, the type of partnership that could prove effective and
meaningful to the grassroots communities. Is
identifying recommendations the most urgent in this type of workshop? Or rather
strategies towards a meaningful partnerships with practitioners, and donor
community towards building a sustainable peace. Contact:
|
|
|